• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TDM Insights

TDM Insights

Tourism Destination Management

  • Categories
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Cultural Heritage
    • Destination Management
    • Destination Image
    • Destination Resilience
    • Innovation
    • Place-making
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Tourism Ethics
    • Tourism Stakeholders
  • Issues
    • Issue V – 2021
    • Issue IV – 2020
    • Special Issue – EIFMeT Masterclass
    • Issue III – 2019
    • Issue II – 2018
    • Issue I – 2017
  • News/events
  • Contact
  • About

Memory of a certain pottery: Response to Lotte Kuijstermans

This is a response to Lotte Kuijstermans’ article: Residents’ perspectives towards community-based ecotourism: a case study from Lombok, Indonesia

To get in a Lombok state of mind as it were, before reading Lotte’s report, I have prepared a cup of tea in a Sasak pottery cup that I brought back from Lombok more than thirty years ago. Hand shaped and above all with a distinct smell and composition of the clay that gives tea infusions its particular taste, the teacup possesses a chronotopic memory. 

While many changes, political, economic, social and cultural have taken place since the end of the 1980s some of the tourism aspects remain remarkably similar even though the transformation from the analog to digital times appears ever so striking. Structural inequality and dominant constructions of tourism imaginary seem to be very much resilient to change.

Top-down State proclamations of sustainability and responsibility are more often than not a token nod to global trends with buzz words such as “eco” community-based, pro-poor, empowerment, etc. Whether the principals of responsibility are implemented and how they are implemented should be a matter of detailed research scrutiny. Active participation of the local community at all levels of decision-making, inclusiveness, access, and ownership of the resources need all be taken into account.

Small-scale projects have been a proposed “alternative” to perceived negative impacts of tourism since the early 1960s, and all things “eco” emerged a decade later. Debate on authenticity introduced by MacCannel in 1976 was followed by numerous research and several adjectives (staged, hot, cold, existential, objective, nominal, indexical, iconic, etc.) making it clear that when different stakeholders are proclaiming tourism “green and authentic” or “primitive and authentic”, both examples used in Lotte’s paper, they may not be talking about the same thing at all. Also, the structural inequality within which most of global tourism is performed maintains the power structure between the state and the selected locality illustrated by the unease of the villagers regarding the proposed Mandalika resort area. 

On the other hand, the predominant tourist imaginary of Indonesian islands found in tourism promotion, guides, travelogues, travel blogs, vlogs and at times also in research remains one of the exotic Other. The iconic rice fields and volcano landscapes along with friendly locals are portrayed in a quest of a traveler’s transformation in literature and film (Weber, 2020). When researchers come to the field they do not come without the visual baggage, and testimonies to that effect are included in many ethnographies. Falling in love with the island is as good as any research motivation, providing the construction of the imaginary is properly reflected upon. Besides, hosts and guests as a binary opposition also calls for some nuanced reflection.

Short time research, no matter how intensive, is only a preliminary or sondage research so data and analysis need to be understood in a thus limited context. More in-depth qualitative research usually requires months or even years to complete. Increasingly, however, ethnographic research takes a form of cumulative research, meaning several shorter kinds of research. These, in turn, may also represent a longitudinal study as is the case with Stroma Cole, referenced in Lotte’s report. I would suggest, though, some of her more topical work to be consulted (Cole, 2012 and Cole, 2017). 

Although Lotte’s research was a short one it represents a possibility of being used as a part of longer cumulative research whether by her or expanded by other students. 

One of the very intriguing findings in the research that was originally focused on natural attractions was how important cultural elements and traditions are for the local inhabitants. Also, visual data, only mentioned in passing could be fruitfully expanded upon, particularly with the help of a sound visual analysis (Rose, 2016). I would suggest keeping in mind that tourism is not merely an industry but a total social phenomenon. It is important not to lose sight of a wider historical context when doing tourism research, along with critical perspectives on the construction of tourism imaginary and structural inequality that tourism can help to address or sadly maintain or reinforce. 

Last but not least, back to the Sasak cup of tea, I appreciate the opportunity to converse with engaging student work. Tampi Asih. 

Secondary Sidebar

Author

Irena Weber
University of Primorska, Faculty of Tourism Studies

Do you have a response?

We aim to be a forum for dialogue on issues connected with tourism destination management, so please contact us if you would like to write a response to one of the articles in the journal.

More to see

The Digital Bow – Empowering initiatives of indigenous community-based tourism during a pandemic

12th December 2021 By Anna Maria Freitag

From an online journey to a physical presence in a destination: digital strategies for the recovery of the industry post-COVID19. The case of the Van Gogh Sites Foundation

12th December 2021 By Talita Lemes & Celiane Camargo-Borges

Tags

AIDA theory animal welfare awareness changes citizen empowerment community-based community involvement COVID-19 Crisis customer journey decision making Destination Management destination recovery digital dog management programme EIFMeT ethnography feedback Free-roaming dogs Greece greenwashing iceberg model ICT Indonesia investment local context locals management marketing multi-stakeholder overtourism residents Rhodes rural shared space social impacts Sustainability Sustainable tourism technology tourism education tourism growth tourist-animal encounters travel advice travel experience Urban tourism

Footer

About TDM Insights

The Master in Tourism Destination Management is proud to present its own online journal “TDM Insights”. The journal is an opportunity for selected programme alumni to present a summary of their master dissertations. BUAS lectureres and other academics and practicioners discuss their work and evaluate their contribution to the tourism literature. Moreover, the editors of TDM Insights invite tourism professionals and experts from other industries to contribute columns on contemporary issues in tourism and destination management.

Recent

  • Editorial – Issue V
  • The Digital Bow – Empowering initiatives of indigenous community-based tourism during a pandemic
  • From an online journey to a physical presence in a destination: digital strategies for the recovery of the industry post-COVID19. The case of the Van Gogh Sites Foundation
  • Work-Integrated Learning: an approach to facilitate continuous innovation in higher tourism education
  • The future of work

Search

Keywords

AIDA theory animal welfare awareness changes citizen empowerment community-based community involvement COVID-19 Crisis customer journey decision making Destination Management destination recovery digital dog management programme EIFMeT ethnography feedback Free-roaming dogs Greece greenwashing iceberg model ICT Indonesia investment local context locals management marketing multi-stakeholder overtourism residents Rhodes rural shared space social impacts Sustainability Sustainable tourism technology tourism education tourism growth tourist-animal encounters travel advice travel experience Urban tourism

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in