• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TDM Insights

TDM Insights

Tourism Destination Management

  • Categories
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Cultural Heritage
    • Destination Management
    • Destination Image
    • Destination Resilience
    • Innovation
    • Place-making
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Tourism Ethics
    • Tourism Stakeholders
  • Issues
    • Issue V – 2021
    • Issue IV – 2020
    • Special Issue – EIFMeT Masterclass
    • Issue III – 2019
    • Issue II – 2018
    • Issue I – 2017
  • News/events
  • Contact
  • About
You are here: Home / Special Issue - EIFMeT Masterclass / The challenges of sustainable tourism marketing

The challenges of sustainable tourism marketing

25th August 2021 by Laura Wertsch

Introduction on sustainable tourism marketing

Over the years, the interest for green products and services has risen tremendously, following companies engaging more and more in the communication of their sustainable actions (Delmas, Burbano, 2011). The incorporation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives into the corporate culture of firms is therefore, to some extent, a result of meeting the increasing demand for sustainable products and services (Font, McCabe, 2017). Thus, successful communication is considered a fundamental part of companies daily business, despite its negative connotations, in particular when it comes to advertising. Nevertheless, marketing is particularly of great interest for tourism businesses since it determines to a large extent the travel volume to destinations and as a result contributes to the (economic) development of the latter (Font, McCabe, 2017). Sustainable marketing in that context is therefore defined by Font and McCabe (2017) as “the application of marketing functions, processes and techniques to a destination, resource or offering, which serves the needs of the visitor and stakeholder community today and ensures the opportunities of future visitors and stakeholders to meet their needs in the future“ (p. 871). Hence implying the importance of sustainable tourism marketing in order to encourage the further development of sustainable tourism at the destinations themselves.

The objective of this paper is to identify the current issues and obstacles facing sustainable tourism marketing and to later provide insights into how it can be used successfully to encourage a behavioural change for consumers.

Greenwashing vs. Greenhushing

When looking at the challenges concerning sustainable marketing, one comes across the term of “greenwashing“. The latter is defined as “the act of misleading consumers regarding the environmental practices of a company (firm-level greenwashing) or the environmental benefits of a product or service (product-level greenwashing)“ (Delmas, Burbano, 2011, p. 6). Thus, firms claim to act responsibly when in reality this is not the case. Consequently, in order to define companies according to their environmental performance and communication, Delmas and Burbano (2011) have created a framework in which companies can be categorized accordingly. In terms of the environmental performance, it can be distinguished between poor and good environmental performers, whilst communication of the environmental performance is either considered as no communication or positive communication.

Hence, greenwashing firms are characterized by a poor environmental performance whilst at the same time pursuing a positive communication about their environmental performances. An example of greenwashing in the tourism industry can be considered Ryanair, as it claims to be “Europe’s greenest, cleanest airline“ (Ryanair, 2020) when it is debatable whether airlines at this point can even be considered as green or clean.

In order to expose greenwashing activities however, external audits are crucial as well as focusing on the transparency in reporting of companies to provide insights on the disclosure-performance gap. This is vital since a positive communication does not automatically indicate a positive performance regarding a company’s sustainable actions (Font, Walmsley, Cogotti, McCombes, Häusler, 2012).

Contrary to the phenomena of “greenwashing“, the term “greenhushing“ describes the opposite, namely “the deliberate withholding, from customers and stakeholders, of information about the sustainability practices that they employ“ (Font, Elgammal, Lamond, 2017, p. 1007). According to a study conducted by Font, Elgammal and Lamond (2017) on small rural tourism businesses in the Peak District National Park (UK), only 30% of the sustainability practices are actively communicated by those businesses which is due on the one hand to a dislike in communicating their actions and benefits solely for promotional purposes. Moreover, there is the fear of being perceived as less competent when strongly emphasizing on sustainable values and actions (Font, Elgammal, Lamond, 2017).

Insights into successful sustainability communication

Despite the issues of greenwashing and greenhushing, there is an attitude-behaviour gap with tourists when it comes to acting responsibly whilst going on vacation. Thus, only a positive intention towards environmentally friendly behaviour does not necessarily indicate a positive behaviour of the tourists at the destination (Juvan, Dolnicar, 2014). Moreover, consumers have a different understanding of what the term sustainability or responsible tourism truly means (Font, McCabe, 2017).

Therefore, there is a strong need for a comprehensive and clear communication towards the consumers to be able to encourage a positive change in their behaviour. As Font and Villarino (2015) have pointed out, there is a huge lack of persuasiveness when it comes to sustainability communication. In order to avoid negative responses or possibly being accused of greenwashing, the majority is focused on providing facts rather than making use of an emotive language that is directed at the individual customer.

However, when using emotive language it is advisable to not act “overly moralizing“ (Font, McCabe, 2017, p. 874) as this is not considered adequate since it prevents customers from being personally engaged. Thus, one should have a good balance between descriptive and emotive language whilst focusing on a positive one, when it comes to the latter.

Finally, implementing a strong sustainability communication strategy for tourism businesses is considered a challenge, however it can in the end be rewarding for the business itself and also have a positive effect on the change of behaviour of the tourists.

References

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Recommended For You

Editorial: Learnings from the EIFMeT Masterclass 2020
Can ICT offer solutions to overtourism?
Smart Tourism Reducing Poverty and Inequality
Post Views: 373

Filed Under: Special Issue - EIFMeT Masterclass Tagged With: communication, consumer behaviour, EIFMeT, greenwashing, marketing, Sustainable tourism

Secondary Sidebar

Author

Laura Wertsch
Student at University for Sustainable Development Eberswalde (Germany)

Do you have a response?

We aim to be a forum for dialogue on issues connected with tourism destination management, so please contact us if you would like to write a response to one of the articles in the journal.

More to see

The Digital Bow – Empowering initiatives of indigenous community-based tourism during a pandemic

12th December 2021 By Anna Maria Freitag

From an online journey to a physical presence in a destination: digital strategies for the recovery of the industry post-COVID19. The case of the Van Gogh Sites Foundation

12th December 2021 By Talita Lemes & Celiane Camargo-Borges

Tags

AIDA theory animal welfare awareness changes citizen empowerment community-based community involvement COVID-19 Crisis customer journey decision making Destination Management destination recovery digital dog management programme EIFMeT ethnography feedback Free-roaming dogs Greece greenwashing iceberg model ICT Indonesia investment local context locals management marketing multi-stakeholder overtourism residents Rhodes rural shared space social impacts Sustainability Sustainable tourism technology tourism education tourism growth tourist-animal encounters travel advice travel experience Urban tourism

Footer

About TDM Insights

The Master in Tourism Destination Management is proud to present its own online journal “TDM Insights”. The journal is an opportunity for selected programme alumni to present a summary of their master dissertations. BUAS lectureres and other academics and practicioners discuss their work and evaluate their contribution to the tourism literature. Moreover, the editors of TDM Insights invite tourism professionals and experts from other industries to contribute columns on contemporary issues in tourism and destination management.

Recent

  • Editorial – Issue V
  • The Digital Bow – Empowering initiatives of indigenous community-based tourism during a pandemic
  • From an online journey to a physical presence in a destination: digital strategies for the recovery of the industry post-COVID19. The case of the Van Gogh Sites Foundation
  • Work-Integrated Learning: an approach to facilitate continuous innovation in higher tourism education
  • The future of work

Search

Keywords

AIDA theory animal welfare awareness changes citizen empowerment community-based community involvement COVID-19 Crisis customer journey decision making Destination Management destination recovery digital dog management programme EIFMeT ethnography feedback Free-roaming dogs Greece greenwashing iceberg model ICT Indonesia investment local context locals management marketing multi-stakeholder overtourism residents Rhodes rural shared space social impacts Sustainability Sustainable tourism technology tourism education tourism growth tourist-animal encounters travel advice travel experience Urban tourism

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in