• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TDM Insights

TDM Insights

Tourism Destination Management

  • Categories
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Cultural Heritage
    • Destination Management
    • Destination Image
    • Destination Resilience
    • Innovation
    • Place-making
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Tourism Ethics
    • Tourism Stakeholders
  • Issues
    • Issue V – 2021
    • Issue IV – 2020
    • Special Issue – EIFMeT Masterclass
    • Issue III – 2019
    • Issue II – 2018
    • Issue I – 2017
  • News/events
  • Contact
  • About
You are here: Home / Innovation / THE BUAS Tourism Panel: A project with long-term vision

THE BUAS Tourism Panel: A project with long-term vision

1st June 2018 by Ondrej Mitas

One of the most important issues in destination management is quality of life. Quality of life is the variable most tourism professionals, researchers, and tourists themselves arrive at when asking “why?” Why do people travel, why must destinations be managed, what is the added value of a tourism industry? Underneath the myriad reasons for these phenomena is the belief that if people can travel in their leisure, somehow the world is a better place. It is possibly better for the residents of destinations, who may make money or gain external perspective (Nawijn & Mitas, 2012), and apparently better for tourists themselves, who enjoy a break in routine (Drewery et al., 2016), seeing something new (Cohen, 1972), and getting a fresh perspective on new or existing relationships (Mitas, Yarnal & Chick, 2012).

However, real evidence of how tourism contributes to people’s quality of life––and here I will focus on tourists’, rather than local residents’, quality of life––is surprisingly thin in the tourism research literature. This is not surprising, given that quality of life is a broad construct and quite difficult to measure. However, governments of the world increasingly operationalize quality of life subjectively, using constructs such as happiness or its more precise, psychological incarnation, subjective well-being. Tourism is known to influence subjective well-being (Kim, Woo & Uysal, 2015), especially its short-lived emotional component (Ondrej). In the words of organizational psychologist Jessica de Bloom, it seems that tourism’s contribution to tourists’ quality of life is “lots of fun, quickly gone” (de Bloom et al., 2010, p. 196). However, more general measures of quality of life, as well as the arguably broader, longer-term well-being component of life satisfaction, does not consistently improve in the days and weeks after a vacation.

While this may be seen as a disappointing finding, I see it as a methodological fault in previous research of tourism and quality of life. Tourism does contribute to quality of life, but not in a way that people’s life satisfaction is necessarily higher after they get back from a holiday. Rather, anticipating, enjoying, and reflecting on a holiday become one of the things people reflect on when they think about their life. This obviously doesn’t change day to day and month to month, but may well change year to year, if people get granted an extra holiday or, conversely, have to skip a holiday for health or financial reasons. Thus, to appreciate the contribution of tourism to individuals’ quality of life, a multi-year analysis is needed. No such analysis occurred until 2014.

In that year, TU Delft researcher Maarten Kroesen blew the tourism-quality of life question wide open with his groundbreaking time-lagged analysis of LISS Panel data collected by the University of Tilburg (Kroesen & Handy, 2014). These data afforded 4 years of quality of life and tourism behavior measures. The analysis showed that indeed, skipping a holiday negatively affected quality of life the year after. The shortcomings of this analysis have to do with measurement of quality of life, which doesn’t include a good measure of emotions, and with the measurement of tourism behavior, which is very basic.

Thus, I would like to introduce here our initiative at NHTV to start a panel of our own oriented precisely at tracking quality of life development over a multi-year time span. We collect participants for the NHTV Tourism Panel through channels including a first-year e-marketing course as well as, hopefully, this column. The panel has existed for about a year and a half now and comprises about 100 participants, mostly living in the Netherlands, who fill out a questionnaire about their tourism behavior and quality of life every six months. With each round of questionnaires, we give away 2 x 100€ of vouchers as an incentive, but the main reason to participate, we hope, is people’s feeling that they are contributing their experiences and opinions to help address this important scientific and societal questions.

Thus, the findings from this panel will also regularly be featured in educational materials, scientific articles, and a regular column here in TDMI. I look forward to reporting new insights to you about tourism and quality of life here. In the meantime, if you would like to join the panel to share your experiences, please send me your email address to mitas.o@nhtv.nl and I will put you on the list.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Recommended For You

Big Data: Its possibilities for facilitating customised tourism for Chinese tourists
Corporate Social Responsibility for Inbound Tour Operators in Vietnam: Perception and Reality and introducting Travelife Certification for the Travel sector
Designing research with creativity: arts-based methods as a way to co-create with destinations
Post Views: 505

Filed Under: Innovation, Issue 2 - 2018

Secondary Sidebar

Author

Ondrej Mitas:
Breda University of Applied Sciences

Do you have a response?

We aim to be a forum for dialogue on issues connected with tourism destination management, so please contact us if you would like to write a response to one of the articles in the journal.

More to see

The Digital Bow – Empowering initiatives of indigenous community-based tourism during a pandemic

12th December 2021 By Anna Maria Freitag

From an online journey to a physical presence in a destination: digital strategies for the recovery of the industry post-COVID19. The case of the Van Gogh Sites Foundation

12th December 2021 By Talita Lemes & Celiane Camargo-Borges

Tags

AIDA theory animal welfare awareness changes citizen empowerment community-based community involvement COVID-19 Crisis customer journey decision making Destination Management destination recovery digital dog management programme EIFMeT ethnography feedback Free-roaming dogs Greece greenwashing iceberg model ICT Indonesia investment local context locals management marketing multi-stakeholder overtourism residents Rhodes rural shared space social impacts Sustainability Sustainable tourism technology tourism education tourism growth tourist-animal encounters travel advice travel experience Urban tourism

Footer

About TDM Insights

The Master in Tourism Destination Management is proud to present its own online journal “TDM Insights”. The journal is an opportunity for selected programme alumni to present a summary of their master dissertations. BUAS lectureres and other academics and practicioners discuss their work and evaluate their contribution to the tourism literature. Moreover, the editors of TDM Insights invite tourism professionals and experts from other industries to contribute columns on contemporary issues in tourism and destination management.

Recent

  • Editorial – Issue V
  • The Digital Bow – Empowering initiatives of indigenous community-based tourism during a pandemic
  • From an online journey to a physical presence in a destination: digital strategies for the recovery of the industry post-COVID19. The case of the Van Gogh Sites Foundation
  • Work-Integrated Learning: an approach to facilitate continuous innovation in higher tourism education
  • The future of work

Search

Keywords

AIDA theory animal welfare awareness changes citizen empowerment community-based community involvement COVID-19 Crisis customer journey decision making Destination Management destination recovery digital dog management programme EIFMeT ethnography feedback Free-roaming dogs Greece greenwashing iceberg model ICT Indonesia investment local context locals management marketing multi-stakeholder overtourism residents Rhodes rural shared space social impacts Sustainability Sustainable tourism technology tourism education tourism growth tourist-animal encounters travel advice travel experience Urban tourism

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in