• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TDM Insights

TDM Insights

Tourism Destination Management

  • Categories
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Cultural Heritage
    • Destination Management
    • Destination Image
    • Destination Resilience
    • Innovation
    • Place-making
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Tourism Ethics
    • Tourism Stakeholders
  • Issues
    • Issue V – 2021
    • Issue IV – 2020
    • Special Issue – EIFMeT Masterclass
    • Issue III – 2019
    • Issue II – 2018
    • Issue I – 2017
  • News/events
  • Contact
  • About

Response to Kishor Chitrakar (By Rami K. Isaac)

This is a response on Kishor Chitrakar’s article: Political Turbulence and Destination Resilience: A Case Study of the Struggle of the Tourism Industry of Nepal amidst Political Instability

I enjoyed reading the article by Kishor. The main question addressed in the article is how tourism can develop during and after a political crisis. I would like to focus on the first part of his research due to the limitation of literature on tourism development during a political crisis. Much of the literature has focused on tourism development in a post-conflict settings, such as in Bosnia and Herzegovina or Rwanda, and the impacts of political instability on tourism and the local economy. In spite of the numerous political dimensions of tourism, the interconnections between politics and tourism are still insufficiently examined (Butler and Suntikul, 2010). Matthews (1978) and Richter (1983) were the first authors to address the importance of the relationship between politics and tourism. Some dimensions of the tourism-politics relationship have been tackled mostly from economic, business and managerial perspectives: for instance, political risk analysis in tourism development (Poirier, 1997), political crisis management (Elliott, 1997), politics and the public sector’s management of tourism (Sönmez, 1998), tourism planning and development in political border destinations (Timothy, 2001), and political marketing of destinations (Beirman, 2002). Much less research, however, has examined the problems, opportunities and implications of tourism during politically unstable times. I think this is one of the strengths of Kishor’s paper.

Ultimately, it is important to question what steps and actions destination management organizations (DMOs), as well as destination marketers, need to take to improve Nepal’s’ image in the eye of potential tourists. I welcomed Kishore’s paper very much as I believe there is very limited research and contribution in the literature focusing on Nepal in general and in particular on the development of tourism during a political crisis.

International tourism is extremely sensitive to safety and security issues (Pizam&Mansfeld, 1996). It is indeed one of the undertakings most vulnerable to changes on the world stage that may cause changes in consumer behaviour (Seabra et al., 2013). Safety and security are significant issues at a destination level and, therefore, should be considered by DMOs as one of the most influential conditions for the development of a tourism destination in a politically unstable environment. In Kishor’s paper, the study likewise found safety to be an important destination attribute in the case of Nepal. This has also been confirmed among German holiday makers, who participated in a study conducted by Isaac & Velden (2018) regarding the attitudes and risk perceptions of German markets about traveling to Turkey as a tourism destination. Only a minority considered safety as of little important or indicated that terrorism would not change their travel behaviour. One of the central points highlighted in Kishor’s paper is that the political situation in Nepal is an influential factor on the potential market travel behaviour.

I am in agreement with Kishor’s paper that the DMO in Nepal must pay attention to the country’s image as a safe and secure destination. The reality of having a safe and secure destination for holidaymakers may not translate into positive perceptions about the same place, however, since image is so subjective (MacKay &Fesenmaier, 1997). An experimental study showed that new information can lead decision-makers to continually reassess their decisions (Sirakaya, Shephard and McLelland, 1998). Their evidence recommends that decision makers are very sensitive about issues of safety and security at a destination. Thus, the challenge for destination marketers is how to manage a destination’s image to eventually result in positive behavioural intensions and outcomes in a climate of political instability such as the case of Nepal.

If destination marketers understand how potential consumers react to safety, and risk perception regarding political crisis, they can create a more effective marketing campaign to influence consumers’ expectations and decision-making. DMOs and stakeholders in Nepal should be aware that safety is nowadays a key attribute for a destination. Accordingly, these perceptions could be improved by creating security and preventive measures during periods of political instability such as increased police presence at tourist sites and resorts. Destination marketers must, therefore, be concerned about minimizing the impacts of turbulence and about the impact of political instability on their image, which requires a careful marketing strategy as also pointed out by Kishor.

Finally and importantly, comprehending the tourism context in Nepal or any destination that ‘enjoys’ political instability, demands an understanding of political context and history. There is a need for academics and practitioners to address these ‘knowledge gaps’ or, more precisely, ‘situations of despair’ (Isaac 2011: 170). One result of this responsibility could be to establish a research agenda on the politico–economic difficulties and opportunities in developing tourism in an unstable environment or political crisis.

Secondary Sidebar

Author

Rami K. Isaac
Breda University of Applied Sciences
Isaac.R@buas.nl

Do you have a response?

We aim to be a forum for dialogue on issues connected with tourism destination management, so please contact us if you would like to write a response to one of the articles in the journal.

More to see

The Digital Bow – Empowering initiatives of indigenous community-based tourism during a pandemic

12th December 2021 By Anna Maria Freitag

From an online journey to a physical presence in a destination: digital strategies for the recovery of the industry post-COVID19. The case of the Van Gogh Sites Foundation

12th December 2021 By Talita Lemes & Celiane Camargo-Borges

Tags

AIDA theory animal welfare awareness changes citizen empowerment community-based community involvement COVID-19 Crisis customer journey decision making Destination Management destination recovery digital dog management programme EIFMeT ethnography feedback Free-roaming dogs Greece greenwashing iceberg model ICT Indonesia investment local context locals management marketing multi-stakeholder overtourism residents Rhodes rural shared space social impacts Sustainability Sustainable tourism technology tourism education tourism growth tourist-animal encounters travel advice travel experience Urban tourism

Footer

About TDM Insights

The Master in Tourism Destination Management is proud to present its own online journal “TDM Insights”. The journal is an opportunity for selected programme alumni to present a summary of their master dissertations. BUAS lectureres and other academics and practicioners discuss their work and evaluate their contribution to the tourism literature. Moreover, the editors of TDM Insights invite tourism professionals and experts from other industries to contribute columns on contemporary issues in tourism and destination management.

Recent

  • Editorial – Issue V
  • The Digital Bow – Empowering initiatives of indigenous community-based tourism during a pandemic
  • From an online journey to a physical presence in a destination: digital strategies for the recovery of the industry post-COVID19. The case of the Van Gogh Sites Foundation
  • Work-Integrated Learning: an approach to facilitate continuous innovation in higher tourism education
  • The future of work

Search

Keywords

AIDA theory animal welfare awareness changes citizen empowerment community-based community involvement COVID-19 Crisis customer journey decision making Destination Management destination recovery digital dog management programme EIFMeT ethnography feedback Free-roaming dogs Greece greenwashing iceberg model ICT Indonesia investment local context locals management marketing multi-stakeholder overtourism residents Rhodes rural shared space social impacts Sustainability Sustainable tourism technology tourism education tourism growth tourist-animal encounters travel advice travel experience Urban tourism

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in