• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TDM Insights

TDM Insights

Tourism Destination Management

  • Categories
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Cultural Heritage
    • Destination Management
    • Destination Image
    • Destination Resilience
    • Innovation
    • Place-making
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Tourism Ethics
    • Tourism Stakeholders
  • Issues
    • Issue V – 2021
    • Issue IV – 2020
    • Special Issue – EIFMeT Masterclass
    • Issue III – 2019
    • Issue II – 2018
    • Issue I – 2017
  • News/events
  • Contact
  • About

Response to Finja Hansen (by Jeroen Nawijn)

This is a response to Finja Hansen’s article: Tourism with a conscience – An empircal investigation of the perception of travelers on CSR-certification of tour operators based in Germany

Certification and labeling are often used in tourism, but their usefulness is debatable (Gössling & Buckley, 2016). This is nicely illustrated in the article of Finja Hansen. The implications of her study on corporate social responsibility (CSR) certification suggest that tourists should be more involved in CSR and its role within the decision-making process of vacations.

My own research has addressed similar topics. For instance, I have participated in research on sustainable behavior of tourists in relation to information communication (Hardeman et al., 2017), carbon labeling (Eijgelaar, Nawijn, Barten, Okuhn, & Dijkstra, 2016), and the gap between intention and behavior (Antimova, Nawijn & Peeters, 2012).

The tour operators of the study mainly use certification as a showcase for external audits. This is a sensible choice! Hansen’s findings and many others (e.g., Eijgelaar et al., 2016; Horne, 2009) find that traditional labels have no or only a very limited effect on tourists’ behavior. We really should give up on expecting these labels or certificates to have any kind of effect on tourist behavior and accept that their main use is simply a marketing tool to dress up company policy measures for the outside world, i.e. external auditors or shareholders. It would be wonderful if tourists actively participate in “post travel events” to discuss sustainable policy measures, as suggested by Hansen, but it seems far removed from reality.

Should we then give up on a sustainable (tourism) future? No. But we should be realistic. Tour operators, airlines, hotels, etc. are for-profit companies. That means that their main goal is to make profit, taking into account national and international laws, and industry guidelines about what is acceptable and what is not within a specific industry. Tourism demand is highly important too, but so far studies show that sustainability ranks low(est) in the decision-making process of tourists (e.g., Eijgelaar et al., 2016). The answer is thus not going to come from the tourism industry nor from tourists, but mainly governmental actions will allow for a more sustainable future (Peeters, 2017).

Secondary Sidebar

Author

Jeroen Nawijn:
Breda University of
Applied Sciences
nawijn.j@buas.nl

Do you have a response?

We aim to be a forum for dialogue on issues connected with tourism destination management, so please contact us if you would like to write a response to one of the articles in the journal.

More to see

The Digital Bow – Empowering initiatives of indigenous community-based tourism during a pandemic

12th December 2021 By Anna Maria Freitag

From an online journey to a physical presence in a destination: digital strategies for the recovery of the industry post-COVID19. The case of the Van Gogh Sites Foundation

12th December 2021 By Talita Lemes & Celiane Camargo-Borges

Tags

AIDA theory animal welfare awareness changes citizen empowerment community-based community involvement COVID-19 Crisis customer journey decision making Destination Management destination recovery digital dog management programme EIFMeT ethnography feedback Free-roaming dogs Greece greenwashing iceberg model ICT Indonesia investment local context locals management marketing multi-stakeholder overtourism residents Rhodes rural shared space social impacts Sustainability Sustainable tourism technology tourism education tourism growth tourist-animal encounters travel advice travel experience Urban tourism

Footer

About TDM Insights

The Master in Tourism Destination Management is proud to present its own online journal “TDM Insights”. The journal is an opportunity for selected programme alumni to present a summary of their master dissertations. BUAS lectureres and other academics and practicioners discuss their work and evaluate their contribution to the tourism literature. Moreover, the editors of TDM Insights invite tourism professionals and experts from other industries to contribute columns on contemporary issues in tourism and destination management.

Recent

  • Editorial – Issue V
  • The Digital Bow – Empowering initiatives of indigenous community-based tourism during a pandemic
  • From an online journey to a physical presence in a destination: digital strategies for the recovery of the industry post-COVID19. The case of the Van Gogh Sites Foundation
  • Work-Integrated Learning: an approach to facilitate continuous innovation in higher tourism education
  • The future of work

Search

Keywords

AIDA theory animal welfare awareness changes citizen empowerment community-based community involvement COVID-19 Crisis customer journey decision making Destination Management destination recovery digital dog management programme EIFMeT ethnography feedback Free-roaming dogs Greece greenwashing iceberg model ICT Indonesia investment local context locals management marketing multi-stakeholder overtourism residents Rhodes rural shared space social impacts Sustainability Sustainable tourism technology tourism education tourism growth tourist-animal encounters travel advice travel experience Urban tourism

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in