• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
TDM Insights

TDM Insights

Tourism Destination Management

  • Categories
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Cultural Heritage
    • Destination Management
    • Destination Image
    • Destination Resilience
    • Innovation
    • Place-making
    • Sustainability
    • Technology
    • Tourism Ethics
    • Tourism Stakeholders
  • Issues
    • Issue V – 2021
    • Issue IV – 2020
    • Special Issue – EIFMeT Masterclass
    • Issue III – 2019
    • Issue II – 2018
    • Issue I – 2017
  • News/events
  • Contact
  • About

Protest as a negative event in the streets of urban tourism destinations

This is a response to Laura Gorlero’s article: PEGIDA and the social conflict in Dresden: An investigation of the economic, social and cultural impact

The tourism sector is fragile in nature, and is greatly affected by broader natural, economic and socio-political events, which can trigger a tourism crisis (Glaesser, 2006). If a tourism crisis occurs, it may generate a downturn in the image of a destination resulting in a negative impact on the tourism industry and pose a challenge to destination management (Çakmak and Isaac, 2012).

In the tourism literature and practice, much attention has been given to the impacts of progressive events (e.g. sport and cultural events) and various scholars suggest that hosting events boosts a destination in terms of exposure and positive image (Nadeau et al., 2016). However, little academic attention has been paid to the impacts of negative social events such as those arising from regular demonstrations and protests in cities.

Gorlero’s (2018) research addresses an interesting under-researched topic, namely the social impacts of negative events in urban tourism. The research is relevant, and timely. Although tourism scholars and practitioners recognize the impact of conflict on tourism development processes, many stakeholders (e.g. policy makers, aid workers, business owners and so on) at the conflict-ridden destinations pursue their own agendas, which influences the character and duration of conflict (Çakmak and Isaac, 2016). Gorlero (2018) highlighted the importance of social comprehension among the stakeholders and how social movements at urban destinations resulting in social conflicts can lead to a tourism crisis.

The report is fine in terms of its discussion of PEGIDA and the reactions it causes in cities and communities, and makes a contribution to the literature as it states. However, it does not provide much evidence about the actual effect on tourism to Dresden in its current form and remains as a conceptual and suggestive piece of research and not a definitive one, given the lack of evidence. Hence, this research needs to provide some facts (e.g. numbers of visitors to Dresden, before and after, and ideally during, PEGIDA campaigns, stakeholders’ quotes, back up references) to support the assumption that PEGIDA demonstrations are likely to deter some tourists. Have numbers declined? Is there evidence from other cities, which have experienced such demonstrations? Overtourism, a phenomena of unsustainable tourism (Dodds and Butler, 2019), has cause abacklash from residents in many destinations (e.g. Barcelona, Venice, Dubrovnik), which had not happened before on such a large scale. For instance, since 2017 an increasing number of protests have taken place in the streets of many overtourism destinations, where the residents gather together and protest against the increasing number of tourists in their cities (Francis, 2018).

Gorlero’s (2018) research examined the context of Dresden well, since it is essential to first understand the context of a conflict-ridden destination before suggesting a recovery destination management strategy. She argued that the social conflict triggered by PEGIDA demonstrations should not be interpreted as a single abstract but as an integrated part of the ongoing social movements which fuel and deepen social tensions in Dresden. This contextual approach blends different perspectives (i.e. big, intermediate, and small stories) in a multidisciplinary way and can be a basis for a recovery destination management strategy that would come from Dresden’s own people.

Gorlero’s research is connected to one of my own research interests in using a narrative approach to examine different forms of conflict and their resolution strategies with regard to destination management (e.g. Çakmak et al., 2018). Gorlero’s (2018) results offer scope for further research to understand how protests affect the tourism industry and on which aspects stakeholders should be urged to collaborate to decrease this effect and increase the quality of life of their residents.

Secondary Sidebar

Author

Erdinç Çakmak
Breda University of Applied Sciences
Cakmak.E@buas.nl

Do you have a response?

We aim to be a forum for dialogue on issues connected with tourism destination management, so please contact us if you would like to write a response to one of the articles in the journal.

More to see

The Digital Bow – Empowering initiatives of indigenous community-based tourism during a pandemic

12th December 2021 By Anna Maria Freitag

From an online journey to a physical presence in a destination: digital strategies for the recovery of the industry post-COVID19. The case of the Van Gogh Sites Foundation

12th December 2021 By Talita Lemes & Celiane Camargo-Borges

Tags

AIDA theory animal welfare awareness changes citizen empowerment community-based community involvement COVID-19 Crisis customer journey decision making Destination Management destination recovery digital dog management programme EIFMeT ethnography feedback Free-roaming dogs Greece greenwashing iceberg model ICT Indonesia investment local context locals management marketing multi-stakeholder overtourism residents Rhodes rural shared space social impacts Sustainability Sustainable tourism technology tourism education tourism growth tourist-animal encounters travel advice travel experience Urban tourism

Footer

About TDM Insights

The Master in Tourism Destination Management is proud to present its own online journal “TDM Insights”. The journal is an opportunity for selected programme alumni to present a summary of their master dissertations. BUAS lectureres and other academics and practicioners discuss their work and evaluate their contribution to the tourism literature. Moreover, the editors of TDM Insights invite tourism professionals and experts from other industries to contribute columns on contemporary issues in tourism and destination management.

Recent

  • Editorial – Issue V
  • The Digital Bow – Empowering initiatives of indigenous community-based tourism during a pandemic
  • From an online journey to a physical presence in a destination: digital strategies for the recovery of the industry post-COVID19. The case of the Van Gogh Sites Foundation
  • Work-Integrated Learning: an approach to facilitate continuous innovation in higher tourism education
  • The future of work

Search

Keywords

AIDA theory animal welfare awareness changes citizen empowerment community-based community involvement COVID-19 Crisis customer journey decision making Destination Management destination recovery digital dog management programme EIFMeT ethnography feedback Free-roaming dogs Greece greenwashing iceberg model ICT Indonesia investment local context locals management marketing multi-stakeholder overtourism residents Rhodes rural shared space social impacts Sustainability Sustainable tourism technology tourism education tourism growth tourist-animal encounters travel advice travel experience Urban tourism

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in